10 Most Questionable Choices That Daniel Craig’s James Bond Made

Daniel Craig’s portrayal of James Bond redefined the iconic spy, adding depth and vulnerability to the character. Starting with 2006’s Casino Royale,the James Bond movie franchise has changed a lot thanks to the Craig-led movies. His 007 was a complicated character who often made choices that were hard to understand. Across Craig’s five Bond movies, the MI6 agent’s decisions were oftentimes driven by his emotions rather than clear thinking, leading to serious damage sooner or later.

✕ Remove Ads

While Craig’s Bond did some things differently, a lot of the time it was precisely that trailblazing quality that eventually cost him dearly. In many of his missions, Bond took risks that put himself and others in danger, and while his impulsive actions made him seem more human, they often didn’t make much sense. With the unexpected ending in No Time To Die, the spy pulled his last questionable move, leaving many in disbelief. Yet, it was the complexity that ultimately made Craig’s Bond such a fascinating, if flawed, version of 007.

10 Letting Blofeld Live

Spectre (2015)

Close

It’s quite clear that the James Bond movies can’t get Blofeld’s death right, as even James Bond himself can’t seem to finish off the villain. In Spectre, the rivalry between Bond and Ernst Stavro Blofeld, played by Christoph Waltz, is deeply personal, which makes Bond’s decision to spare him somewhat questionable, to say the least.

✕ Remove Ads

Still, though odd, Bond’s decision to let Blofeld live appears to have been a conscious effort to be better than his enemies.

The choice not to kill Blofeld especially doesn’t make sense when one remembers that less than half an hour earlier, Bond had indeed attempted to kill Blofeld with explosives. Moreover, as the head of SPECTRE, Blofeld is one of the most dangerous people in the world, and leaving him alive practically guarantees that he will regroup and continue his operations, something Bond must have been aware of. Still, though odd, Bond’s decision to let Blofeld live appears to have been a conscious effort to be better than his enemies.

9 Trusting Mr. White

Quantum of Solace (2008)

Close
✕ Remove Ads

Given that Mr. White is the most important villain in Daniel Craig’s James Bond era, it’s not entirely surprising that Bond chose to trust him in Quantum of Solace despite their complicated history. Nonetheless, the choice remains highly questionable.

“[
Quantum of Solace
] surpasses its predecessor in almost every way and delivers the best Bond film in over a decade.” –
ScreenRant’s
Quantum of Solace
review

Mr. White (Jesper Christensen) played a key role in betraying Bond in the previous installment, Casino Royale. He was directly involved in the events that led to Vesper Lynd’s (Eva Green) death, solidifying him as a proven enemy of both Bond and MI6. As a result, trusting a compromised figure like him was inherently risky. While Bond’s desperation to uncover the Quantum network helps explain his choice, Mr. White had no real reason to give Bond any accurate intel. Additionally, his motives were very obviously unclear, and Bond had no leverage to ensure Mr. White was honest, making this decision not only controversial but also somewhat unconvincing.

✕ Remove Ads

8 Gambling With MI6’s Finances

Casino Royale (2006)

Close

James Bond’s choice to gamble MI6’s money in a high-stakes poker game to bankrupt Le Chiffre (played by Mads Mikkelsen) in Casino Royale was a daring move that came with several layers of recklessness. Granted, while the fictional MI6 from the spy franchise is likely funded by the government and various other sources, much like the real deal, blowing millions on a poker game is far from a reasonable choice, even for Bond.

Dominic Greene, 006, and Elliot Carver in Bond movies Related James Bond Franchise’s 5 Best & 5 Worst Villains

The James Bond franchise has delivered some of the greatest villains in cinema history, but the series has also had some disappointing foes.

Posts28

✕ Remove Ads

As Bond puts a massive amount of money on the line — $15 million, to be exact — the stakes are astronomical, but he doesn’t appear too worried at any moment. Moreover, the agent has no alternative if he loses the money (that is, until the CIA’s Felix Leiter, played by Jeffrey Wright, shows up), making the move simply irresponsible. While clearly a self-created risk, the all-out poker moves did target Le Chiffre’s financial vulnerabilities, ultimately making Bond come out on top.

7 Leaving Madeleine Swann Alone

Spectre (2015)

Close

James Bond’s decision to leave Madeleine Swann (Léa Seydoux) alone in Spectre, especially given the circumstances, was a particularly baffling choice for several reasons. For starters, Madeleine was a key figure in Bond’s life at that point and thus a potential target for SPECTRE. Additionally, she lacked any significant skills to keep herself alive on her own, which meant that Bond’s decision put her in immediate danger.

✕ Remove Ads

Considering that he had already made a similar mistake in the past, and it did not go well more than once, Bond’s line of thought seems to have been more impulsive than anything else.

From a strategic standpoint, the decision to leave her unprotected also made very little sense. Bond was not in a situation where he had to be elsewhere, nor was he facing an immediate threat, making his choice to leave without Madeleine quite questionable. Considering that he had already made a similar mistake in the past, and it did not go well more than once, Bond’s line of thought seems to have been more impulsive than anything else.

6 Failing To Secure MI6’s Funds

Casino Royale (2006)

Close

✕ Remove Ads

While gambling with your company’s money in the name of a very important cause can be understood, not taking the necessary precautions while doing so is not. The issue lies in James Bond allowing MI6’s $120 million to remain completely unprotected in Casino Royale, which undermines the primary goal of the mission. Given that the point was to beat Le Chiffre and disrupt his financial operations, risking a loss meant that the funds could fall into the wrong hands, directly benefiting Quantum.

Related How Every James Bond Actor Compares To The Original 007

With a new 007 predictably comes a comparison to previous Bonds, but how does each actor compare to Fleming’s original literary character?

Posts

In addition, Bond should have been aware of Le Chiffre’s desperation and the lengths to which Quantum would go to secure their resources. It should have been obvious to both him and MI6 that any large transfer of money could be a prime target for interception or fraud. Not only was this choice questionable, but it also contradicted Bond’s usual meticulous attention to detail and operational awareness.

✕ Remove Ads

5 Recklessly Exposing Himself At Skyfall Lodge

Skyfall (2012)

Close

Many consider Skyfall to be the best James Bond movie of all time, but that doesn’t mean the titular character’s choices were always sound. One of his more reckless moves in the film was luring Silva (played by Javier Bardem) to Skyfall Lodge, Bond’s childhood home, without proper preparation.

“Scene to scene, moment to moment, [
Skyfall
] offers one of the richest and most interesting Bond adventures.” –
ScreenRant’s
Skyfall
review

✕ Remove Ads

Bond’s plan to confront Silva relied entirely on improvised defenses like booby traps and firearms, which ultimately put the seasoned agent in pointless danger. Furthermore, Bond wasn’t alone; he brought M (played by Judi Dench) along, exposing her to danger as well. The thing is, using himself as bait was completely unnecessary, as Silva’s personal vendetta against Bond means that he could have been drawn out without risking M’s safety or Bond’s own life. While the choice was undoubtedly questionable, it can be viewed as a nostalgic plot choice that added depth to the story.

4 Refusing Backup Against Silva

Skyfall (2012)

Close

James Bond’s decision to face Silva the way that he did in Skyfall was problematic for several reasons, with one of the most obvious ones being refusing backup. Although he had well-known resources and access to MI6’s assistance, Bond opted to handle Silva without any reinforcements, proving it was a choice driven more by ego than strategy.

✕ Remove Ads

Split image of Bond adjusting his cufflink and Silva smiling menacingly in Skyfall Related Skyfall At 10: 10 Things That Still Hold Up Today

From Daniel Craig’s nuanced performance as James Bond to Adele’s Oscar-winning theme, many aspects of Skyfall still hold up on its 10th anniversary.

Posts

As a highly skilled and resourceful antagonist with access to extensive manpower, advanced technology, and weaponry, Silva was one of the most iconic villains in the James Bond franchise. Despite knowing this, Bond allowed overconfidence to cloud his judgment. With no practical benefit to excluding MI6 from his plan, 007’s choice to do so ultimately played a direct role in M’s death. With backup, Silva’s forces could have been neutralized more effectively, possibly saving M’s life and sparing Bond the emotional trauma he later suffered.

3 Allowing Sévérine To Be Executed

Skyfall (2012)

Close

✕ Remove Ads

As mentioned before, Skyfall was ridden with its fair share of James Bond’s questionable choices. Arguably, his worst one was allowing Sévérine (played by Bérénice Marlohe) to be executed while he stood by. The moment was completely out of character for Bond, who, throughout the franchise, has proven to be someone who protects the vulnerable, particularly women.

Granted, Bond’s options were limited at the moment, but he still made no visible effort to de-escalate the situation or save Sévérine, which felt shockingly apathetic. To make matters worse, his casual quip after her death (“What a waste of good Scotch”) made him seem disturbingly detached, which was quite a contrast to the overarching theme of Skyfall. Much of the movie centers on his sense of duty and inner conflict about whether he still has what it takes to be 007, making this scenario feel jarringly out of place.

✕ Remove Ads

2 Choosing To Die

No Time to Die (2021)

Close

It turns out there actually is a time for James Bond to die. While Daniel Craig explained the reasoning behind his Bond’s No Time To Die ending, the emotional finale threw many off guard for several reasons. Not only was it unexpected for Craig’s 007 legacy to end like that, but more importantly, his tragic end seemed avoidable.

With no clear need for his sacrifice, the choice felt out of character, favoring a dramatic finale over Bond’s usual determination.

✕ Remove Ads

Although a noble thing to do, Bond’s decision to sacrifice himself to protect his family doesn’t entirely add up. He could have just as easily escaped the island and continued fighting Safin’s (played by Rami Malek) forces, ensuring MI6 had the opportunity to destroy the virus and eliminate future threats, including those against his family. Instead, Bond chooses to end his story then and there, resulting in a confusing ending. With no clear need for his sacrifice, the choice felt out of character, favoring a dramatic finale over Bond’s usual determination.

1 Eloping With Vesper

Casino Royale (2006)

Close

James Bond’s choice to elope with Vesper Lynd in Casino Royale is the pinnacle of confusion in the spy franchise, driven more by emotion than any kind of logic. Despite Vesper’s mysterious behavior and hints of questionable trustworthiness, Bond allowed his feelings for her to overshadow his responsibilities as an MI6 agent, leading to a critical lapse in judgment.

✕ Remove Ads

As a spy, Bond’s duty to his mission and loyalty to MI6 should take precedence over personal relationships. By choosing to run off with Vesper, Bond essentially abandoned his mission to stop Le Chiffre, neglecting his professional commitment in favor of a romantic escape. In addition, Vesper exhibited several warning signs of potential betrayal before her Quantum connections came to light, making Bond look naive. It was definitely not a good look for the spy icon and ultimately set into motion tragic consequences that would haunt Craig’s 007 for the rest of his James Bond series.

Your changes have been saved

Email is sent

Email has already been sent

Daniel Craig as James Bond in the No Time To Die (2021) trailer, wearing a black shirt James Bond

James Bond, designated as agent 007, is a British secret service operative renowned for his espionage skills, sophisticated demeanor, and penchant for high-stakes missions. Created by novelist Ian Fleming in 1952, Bond has become an iconic figure in both literature and film, symbolizing the archetype of the suave and resourceful spy.

Created By Ian Fleming Cast Sean Connery , George Lazenby , Roger Moore , Timothy Dalton , Pierce Brosnan , Daniel Craig First Appearance Dr. No Franchise James Bond

Bio

As a Commander in the Royal Navy and a top agent for MI6, James Bond embodies the quintessential spy: resourceful, unflappable, and always prepared. His missions often involve high-tech gadgets, exotic locales, and encounters with formidable adversaries. Despite his often solitary profession, Bond maintains close professional relationships with colleagues like M, Q, and Moneypenny, adding layers to his complex persona.

Expand
✕ Remove Ads